Prototype created byMastermind Group Ventures LLCReloading clears your changesStrategic Plan Tracking Software
See what is done, what needs attention, and what happens next.
This interactive visual prototype is a proof of concept for custom-built strategic plan tracking software. It shows possible steps for annual updates, presentations, review and reporting.
The separately provided written RFI response compares existing software, including Envisio and ClearPoint, and answers all of the City’s questions.
Example staff names, record numbers, assignments, dates, targets and progress figures are hypothetical. The City’s plan areas and source references come from its published materials.
Staff would sign in with their City account. Each saved change would record the person, time, earlier value, new value and supporting source. Another authorized person would review the update. Protected storage would retain earlier records and source copies under the City’s retention rules.
This demonstration uses example names and keeps changes in this browser session. It does not authenticate users or protect records against changes outside the website.
All example accounts can try the insight and report tools. The City would decide who can prepare and approve reports.
2026 includes all 13 example goals. A quarter or month focuses on the goals scheduled within it.
Chesapeake’s strategic plan
See which goals meet their targets. Select a goal below to see the details. Choose a year, quarter or month to see the work scheduled for that period. Every goal stays connected to the yearly view.
Showing 13 of 13 example goals. 12 have updates due for this period; 1 are future work with no update due.
Chesapeake’s strategic plan
Find the work behind each goal, prepare the yearly update, and keep presentations on schedule.
2026 reporting year → January–December 2026
All six Desired Outcomes · 13 of 13 example goals in January–December 2026
9 of 13 goals have accepted updates
6 of 13 goals have met their targets
1 awaiting review · 2 not submitted. 12 updates due for January–December 2026. 7 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 2 below target; 1 awaiting target review; 1 awaiting update review; 2 with no update submitted; 1 future work with no update scheduled. 1 goal outside the work plan.
Three example policies · Two have work selected
3 of 3 goals have accepted updates
2 of 3 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 3 updates due for January–December 2026. 1 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 1 below target.
Other City policies have not been imported.
Accepted updates show what has been reviewed. Goals meeting their targets show how the work is going. Each goal is counted once within each plan. These counts do not mean that the whole plan is complete.
Open an outcome to see the goals behind its progress.
2 of 2 goals have accepted updates
2 of 2 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. All goals in this view have met their targets.
Accepted progress: 94% · Target: 90%
May 2026 · Resident services team
Accepted progress: 100% · Target: 100%
February 2026 · Public information team
2 of 3 goals have accepted updates
2 of 3 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. 1 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 1 future work with no update scheduled. 1 goal outside the work plan.
Accepted progress: 90% · Target: 90%
April 2026 · Street repair team
Accepted progress: 96% · Target: 90%
July 2026 · Parks team
Not in work plan
Future work · Transport planning team
2 of 2 goals have accepted updates
2 of 2 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. All goals in this view have met their targets.
Accepted progress: 100% · Target: 100%
March 2026 · History and culture team
Accepted progress: 92% · Target: 90%
October 2026 · Business support team
2 of 2 goals have accepted updates
0 of 2 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. 2 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 2 below target.
Accepted progress: 76% · Target: 90%
January 2026 · Housing support team
Accepted progress: 81% · Target: 90%
August 2026 · Permit review team
1 of 2 goals have accepted updates
0 of 2 goals have met their targets
1 awaiting review. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. 2 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 1 awaiting target review; 1 awaiting update review.
Accepted progress: 86% · Target needs review · Work changed
September 2026 · Drainage team
Awaiting review
June 2026 · Water testing team
0 of 2 goals have accepted updates
0 of 2 goals have met their targets
2 not submitted. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. 2 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 2 with no update submitted.
Not submitted
November 2026 · Home fire safety team
Not submitted
December 2026 · Emergency training team
Three City policies are shown below with hypothetical work and progress. The linked goals show part of the work that could support each policy.
GEN 8 · General policies
Promote a collaborative, inclusive approach to government work with ample public notification and sharing of information on issues residents care about or are impacted by.
Comprehensive Plan · Implementation, page 260 ↗2 of 2 goals have accepted updates
2 of 2 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 2 updates due for January–December 2026. All goals in this view have met their targets.
Accepted progress: 94% · Target: 90%
May 2026 · Resident services team
Accepted progress: 100% · Target: 100%
February 2026 · Public information team
GEN 10 · General policies
Continue to adjust the development review process so applicants are aware of the City’s expectations at the outset and are able to efficiently submit projects.
Comprehensive Plan · Implementation, page 261 ↗1 of 1 goals have accepted updates
0 of 1 goals have met their targets
No updates waiting. 1 updates due for January–December 2026. 1 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 1 below target.
Accepted progress: 81% · Target: 90%
August 2026 · Permit review team
GEN 5 · General policies
Introduce a participatory component into the budget process in order to give residents a greater role.
Comprehensive Plan · Implementation, page 259 ↗Not selected in this example
No work is assigned here, so no progress is reported. This is not a statement about the City’s actual work.
1 awaiting review · 2 not submitted
12 goal updates are due for this period. 1 future goals have no update due and remain in the total.7 not yet confirmed as meeting their targets: 2 below target; 1 awaiting target review; 1 awaiting update review; 2 with no update submitted; 1 future work with no update scheduled.
Both cards cover the same 13 goals. An update still awaiting review stays in this total.Select a goal to see its progress, responsible team, and next step.
| Goal and responsible team | Update status | Reviewed result | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accepted | 94% | ||
| Accepted | 100% | ||
| Accepted | 90% | ||
| Accepted | 96% | ||
| Accepted | 100% | ||
| Accepted | 92% | ||
| Accepted | 76% | ||
| Accepted | 81% | ||
| Accepted | 86% | ||
| Awaiting review | — | ||
| Not submitted | — | ||
| Not submitted | — | ||
| Not in work plan | — |
Copilot example
With an approved AI connection, the software could use earlier updates to show patterns, explain changes and suggest where to focus.
This version uses built-in calculations, not a live AI service.
Prepared illustrations
Select a question to read the prepared answer and the records behind it.
June 30, 2026 reporting snapshot · Reviewed through July 8, 2026 · All six plan areas
These prepared answers always cover all six plan areas, using a fixed April–June 2026 example and the earlier quarters named in each answer. Your selected plan area and changes do not change them. The current-data answers below use your selected plan area.
In the real application, you could ask an ordinary question without naming a Microsoft tool. The assistant would use only City-approved sources you may access. Power BI and SharePoint are shown as possible sources here; no Microsoft system is connected.
Data covered: All plan areas · January–December 2026 · 13 goals. Accepted results show progress; other updates show what still needs review.
This example uses the goal records in this session. Saved insight versions last until you reload.
Generate insights to see which goals meet their targets, what information is missing and where a follow-up could help.
Each saved insight keeps its goal IDs, reporting period, accepted values, targets, review status and dated sources. New insights use the latest records while earlier versions stay available. More updates can fill gaps and support comparisons across time; they do not train a model by themselves.
In a City system, staff could choose updates after a review decision or on a schedule. A person checks each AI answer against its sources, calculations and important gaps. The person using the answer remains responsible for the report or decision. The example uses the Generate insights button.